Astro vs Next.js ComparisonZero-JS content sites vs full-stack React apps: the framework choice most teams get wrong
Astro launched in 2021 with a radical idea: ship zero JavaScript by default, and only hydrate the components that actually need interactivity. For marketing sites, blogs, docs, and landing pages, which represents the majority of the web, and this produces dramatically faster pages than React-based frameworks. Next.js remains the right choice for applications: dashboards, SaaS products, e-commerce, and anything with user auth and dynamic data. The mistake teams make is reaching for Next.js for every project, including sites that would be faster and simpler in Astro.
Head-to-head summary
Detailed comparison
Our verdict
There's no universal winner. Astro wins for content sites (marketing sites, blogs, documentation, landing pages) where minimal JavaScript means better Core Web Vitals, lower hosting costs, and simpler deployments. Next.js wins for applications: SaaS, dashboards, e-commerce, anything with auth, dynamic data, and complex UI state. Many teams benefit from using both: Astro for the marketing site, Next.js for the app.
When to choose each
Choose Astro when:
- You're building a marketing site, blog, documentation site, or landing page
- Core Web Vitals and page speed scores are important for SEO or conversions
- Your team wants to use different UI frameworks in the same project
- You want to minimise client-side JavaScript and hosting complexity
Choose Next.js when:
- You're building a SaaS application, dashboard, or any product with user auth
- Your app has complex UI state that benefits from React's ecosystem
- You need server actions, middleware, and full-stack React capabilities
- Your team knows React deeply and doesn't want to learn a new framework
Frequently asked questions
Ready to start your Astro or Next.js project?
Tell us what you're building with Astro or Next.js. We'll respond within 24 hours.
We limit intake each month so every project gets the focus it deserves.