Search

Search pages, services, tech stack, and blog posts

Proprietary LLM Comparison 2026 Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Grok 4.20 — benchmarks, pricing, and real-world performance

All four frontier proprietary models now score above 72% on SWE-bench Verified, but they diverge sharply on price, context window, and specialised strengths. Gemini 3.1 Pro leads reasoning benchmarks (94.3% GPQA Diamond) and offers the cheapest output pricing at $12/1M tokens for prompts under 200K. Claude Opus 4.6 leads on SWE-bench (80.8%) and agentic coding. GPT-5.4 introduces native computer-use — the first general-purpose model with built-in GUI and browser control. Grok 4.20 offers the largest context window (2M tokens) at the lowest output price ($6/1M) with live web access via X.

Closed-Source Frontier LLMs

API-only models from the major AI labs as of April 2026, evaluated across pricing, benchmarks, and real-world strengths.

Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic
GPT-5.4
GPT-5.4OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle
Grok 4.20
Grok 4.20xAI
Dimension
Claude Opus 4.6Claude Opus 4.6
GPT-5.4GPT-5.4
Gemini 3.1 ProGemini 3.1 Pro
Grok 4.20Grok 4.20
Context window1M tokens272K (standard) — up to 1M via extended config1M tokens2M tokens
Input price (per 1M tokens)$5.00$2.50 (≤272K) / $5.00 (>272K)$2.00 (≤200K) / $4.00 (>200K)$2.00
Output price (per 1M tokens)$25.00$15.00$12.00 (≤200K) / $18.00 (>200K)$6.00
SWE-bench Verified80.8%~74.9%~80.6% (variance across evaluators — some report 63.8%)72–75% (Grok 4 Code; not yet confirmed by benchmark org)
Reasoning (GPQA Diamond)91.3%92.0%94.3% — highest of the four~87.5%
Multimodal inputText + imagesText + images + native computer-use (GUI / browser control)Text + images + audio + videoText + images + video (via grok-imagine suite)
Real-time data accessNo — knowledge cutoff Aug 2025No — static training dataNo — static training dataYes — live X/web data access built in
API availabilityAnthropic API, AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex AIOpenAI API, Azure OpenAIGoogle AI API, Vertex AI (preview status as of Apr 2026)xAI API only
Best forAutonomous coding agents, large-context document analysis, agentic workflowsComputer-use automation, broad ecosystem, voice/audio applicationsReasoning benchmarks, multimodal tasks, cost-sensitive long-context inferenceReal-time data apps, lowest output cost, 2M-token analysis

When to choose each

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

  • Autonomous coding via Claude Code (80.8% SWE-bench Verified — highest of the four)
  • 1M-context analysis of large codebases, contracts, or research papers
  • Enterprise agentic workflows needing careful permission controls
  • Teams using AWS Bedrock or Google Vertex AI infrastructure
GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4

  • Computer-use automation — the only general-purpose model with native screen/browser control
  • Teams deep in the OpenAI or Azure OpenAI ecosystem
  • Voice and audio applications via GPT-5.4 audio input
  • Broadest third-party plugin and integration ecosystem
Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro

  • Projects needing the highest reasoning accuracy (94.3% GPQA Diamond)
  • Multimodal analysis combining images, audio, and video in one prompt
  • Cost-sensitive inference — cheapest output price ($12/1M) for prompts under 200K
  • Google Workspace integration and Vertex AI deployment
Grok 4.20

Grok 4.20

  • Applications needing live social media data or real-time web context
  • Largest context window (2M tokens) at the lowest output cost ($6/1M)
  • Social listening, market monitoring, and trend analysis via X platform
  • Multi-agent tasks using Grok 4.20 Heavy (16-agent specialist system)

Our verdict

Context-dependent

No proprietary model wins across all dimensions in April 2026. Gemini 3.1 Pro leads on reasoning (94.3% GPQA) and offers the lowest output price at $12/1M. Claude Opus 4.6 leads autonomous coding at 80.8% SWE-bench. GPT-5.4 uniquely offers native computer-use. Grok 4.20 has the largest context window (2M tokens), lowest output cost ($6/1M), and live web/X data access. Choose based on primary workload: coding → Claude, reasoning/multimodal → Gemini, computer-use → GPT, real-time data → Grok.

Sources & References

  1. 01
    Anthropic Model Docs — Claude Opus 4.6

    Official model specifications, pricing, and context window

  2. 02
    OpenAI — Introducing GPT-5.4

    Official announcement; March 5, 2026

  3. 03
    Google AI — Gemini 3.1 Pro Models Page

    Released February 19, 2026; preview status

  4. 04
    Google AI — Gemini API Pricing

    Official tiered pricing for Gemini 3.1 Pro

  5. 05
    xAI API — Models and Pricing

    Grok 4.20: $2.00/$6.00 per 1M tokens, 2M context window

  6. 06
    SWE-bench Leaderboard

    Canonical benchmark for autonomous software engineering tasks

  7. 07
    Artificial Analysis — LLM Benchmarks

    Independent quality, speed, and price comparisons across providers

Frequently asked questions




Related comparisons

Explore more technology comparisons.

Ready to start your AI project?

Tell us what you're building with AI. We'll respond within 24 hours.

1 spot available in May 2026Apr 2026 fully booked

We limit intake each month so every project gets the focus it deserves.