What services does A Major offer?

A Major offers web design, web app development, mobile app development (React Native, Swift, Flutter), SaaS product development, enterprise systems, UI/UX design, DevOps, performance optimization, MCP server development, AI agent infrastructure, MVP scoping, digital transformation, and engineering consultancy.

Where is A Major based?

A Major is based in Singapore and works with clients worldwide.

Do you work with international clients?

Yes. While headquartered in Singapore, A Major works with founders and businesses across Southeast Asia, Europe, and North America.

Ryu is an AI agent orchestration layer built by A Major. It enables teams to run, coordinate, and monitor AI agents at scale — connecting LLMs, tools, and workflows into reliable production systems.

Do you build MCP servers?

Yes. A Major builds Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers that connect AI agents to databases, APIs, and internal tools, enabling reliable LLM-powered workflows in production environments.

Can I deploy Next.js on Netlify?

Yes. Netlify has a Next.js runtime adapter that supports App Router, RSC, and most Next.js features. A few Vercel-specific features (like Vercel's OG image generation or some ISR edge cases) behave differently. For most apps, Netlify's Next.js support is sufficient.

Is Vercel too expensive at scale?

Vercel's pricing can surprise teams at scale — especially if you have high bandwidth or many serverless function invocations. At meaningful scale, running your own infrastructure on AWS or GCP often becomes cheaper. We help teams model costs before committing.

What about Cloudflare Pages?

Cloudflare Pages is a strong third option, especially for globally distributed apps or Cloudflare Workers-heavy architectures. It's significantly cheaper at scale. The tradeoff is a less polished developer experience and more manual configuration.

Which platform is better for Singapore-based teams?

Both have edge nodes in Singapore and Southeast Asia. Vercel's infrastructure performs well regionally. For Singapore-based applications, either works — the framework choice matters more than the platform for local performance.

Vercel vs Netlify ComparisonThe two dominant frontend clouds — what the platform decision actually affects

Vercel and Netlify were neck-and-neck for most of the early 2020s. Vercel's acquisition of Next.js team members and its deep integration with the framework gave it a decisive lead for React projects. Netlify has responded with its own features and remains the better choice for non-Next.js frameworks, static sites, and teams that want more flexibility in their build toolchain. For Next.js specifically, Vercel's native support is hard to beat — some features like React Server Components and ISR work optimally only on Vercel.

Head-to-head summary

Vercel wins

Ties

Netlify wins

Detailed comparison

Next.js support

Vercel

Best-in-class — built by the Next.js team, all features first-class

Netlify

Good — community adapter, most features supported but not first-party

Other framework support

Vercel

Good — official adapters for most frameworks

Netlify

Excellent — Netlify often has better adapters for non-Next.js frameworks

Preview deployments

Vercel

Excellent — fast, reliable, GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket integrated

Netlify

Excellent — deploy previews are a Netlify original, very polished

Edge functions

Vercel

Vercel Edge Functions — V8 isolates, fast cold starts

Netlify

Netlify Edge Functions — Deno-based, slightly more capable runtime

Pricing

Vercel

Can escalate quickly — bandwidth and function invocations add up

Netlify

Comparable — similar pricing structure, slightly more generous free tier

Build times

Vercel

Fast — Remote Caching reduces rebuild times significantly

Netlify

Fast — good build infrastructure, Distributed Deploys available

Vendor lock-in

Vercel

Higher — Vercel-specific features (ISR, OG images) are harder to migrate

Netlify

Lower — Netlify's primitives are closer to open standards

Our verdict

We recommend: Vercel

Vercel is the better choice for Next.js projects — it's built by the same team and some features behave differently (and better) on Vercel's infrastructure. For other frameworks (Astro, SvelteKit, Remix, Nuxt), Netlify is competitive and sometimes better. If vendor lock-in concerns you, Netlify gives you more portability.

When to choose each

Choose Vercel when:

You're building with Next.js — Vercel is the native deployment target
You need React Server Components and ISR to work as documented
Your team uses Turborepo — Vercel's Remote Caching integrates natively
DX matters most — Vercel's dashboard and CLI are exceptionally polished

Choose Netlify when:

You're using Astro, SvelteKit, Nuxt, Remix, or another non-Next.js framework
You want more control over your build process and serverless functions
Vendor lock-in concerns you — Netlify's abstractions are closer to open web standards
You need Netlify Forms, Identity, or its CMS integrations